Showing posts with label Corporate Governance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corporate Governance. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

BOOKS. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & THE VALUE OF INDEPENDENCE

AM | @Mackfinance

Andrew Hill, from the indispensable Financial Times, publishes a review of sorts of Jeff Gramm's book Dear Chairman. Board Battles and the Rise of Shareholder Activism (New York: HarperCollins, 2016) (*). Gramm —a hedge fund inversor and a professor at Columbia Business School — tells the story of shareholder activism in the US from the 1920s to today. Hill singles out the battle between GM CEO Roger Smith and independent director Ross Perot about the ill-fated acquisition of Hughes Aircraft; he puts forward "the value of true director independence". From the editors:



A sharp and illuminating history of one of capitalism’s longest running tensions—the conflicts of interest among public company directors, managers, and shareholders—told through entertaining case studies and original letters from some of our most legendary and controversial investors and activists. Recent disputes between shareholders and major corporations, including Apple and DuPont, have made headlines. But the struggle between management and those who own stock has been going on for nearly a century. Mixing never-before-published and rare, original letters from Wall Street icons—including Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffett, Ross Perot, Carl Icahn, and Daniel Loeb—with masterful scholarship and professional insight, Dear Chairman traces the rise in shareholder activism from the 1920s to today, and provides an invaluable and unprecedented perspective on what it means to be a public company, including how they work and who is really in control.

Jeff Gramm analyzes different eras and pivotal boardroom battles from the last century to understand the factors that have caused shareholders and management to collide. Throughout, he uses the letters to show how investors interact with directors and managers, how they think about their target companies, and how they plan to profit. Each is a fascinating example of capitalism at work told through the voices of its most colorful, influential participants. A hedge fund manager and an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, Gramm has spent as much time evaluating CEOs and directors as he has trying to understand and value businesses. He has seen public companies that are poorly run, and some that willfully disenfranchise their shareholders. While he pays tribute to the ingenuity of public company investors, Gramm also exposes examples of shareholder activism at its very worst, when hedge funds engineer stealthy land-grabs at the expense of a company’s long term prospects.

(*) Andrew Hill: "Lasting lessons from smug CEOs and somnolent shareholders", Financial Times, 2 de febrero de 2016.
_______________

Monday, March 11, 2013

[CORPORATE GOVERNANCE] BOARD STORIES

- Toyota: Outside directors for the first time. After spending the past four years battling crises, Toyota Motor Corp. signaled it is ready to go on the offensive. The Japanese auto maker on Wednesday announced its biggest management overhaul since founding-family scion Akio Toyoda took over as president in 2009. The moves will open up the world’s No. 1 auto maker to its first outside directors in its 76-year history, accelerate generational change in the executive ranks and streamline the company’s decision-making. Among the three outside directors named to the board is Mark Hogan, a former General Motors Co. executive who once ran a now-dissolved California joint venture between Toyota and GM.

Commenting on the move to appoint outside directors for the first time, despite the relative insularity of Japanese businesses, Mr. Toyoda said the company wants to improve transparency after years of requests by shareholders to take on external board members. “As a global company, we’d like people to view us as an open company,” he said. The move by Toyota—Japan’s largest company by revenue—to add outside directors to its board marks a significant shift, not just for the auto maker, but also for corporate Japan. Major Japanese companies have, historically, been reluctant to bring outsiders into the boardroom.
 
Under Toyota’s new board, three of 16 directors, or 19%, will be outsiders. In addition to Mr. Hogan, the company said it is nominating as directors a Japanese life-insurance executive and the head of a company in charge of clearing and settling securities transactions. The management changes will take place pending a vote at the annual general shareholders’ meeting in June.
 
[Yoshio Takahashi & Yoree Koh: "In Shake-Up, Toyota Turns to Outsiders", Wall Street Journal, 7 March 2013]
______________
 
- Transocean: calls for dividend. Transocean, the offshore drilling rig operator, plans to pay its first dividend for more than a year, as it responds to pressure from Carl Icahn, the activist investor who took a 5.6 per cent stake in the company in January. Transocean, the world's largest offshore drilling company by market capitalisation, said on Sunday that its board had recommended a divividend of $2.24 a share, worth a total of $800m, to be paid in installments from June 2013 to March 2014.
 
That is less than the $4 called for by Mr Icahn, who said in January he would put his demand at the annual meeting, set for May 17. The company stopped paying a dividend in March 2012 as credit rating warned that its debt could lose its investment-grade status.
 
[Ed Crooks: "Transocean responds to call for dividend payout", Financial Times, 5 March 2013].
______________
 
 

Thursday, March 7, 2013

[CORPORATE FINANCE] THE BOARD @UBS

From the UBS website: background info on risk management and control responsibilities [see]. The Board looks quite powerful indeed:

The key roles and responsibilities for risk management and control are as follows:
The Board of Directors (BoD) is responsible for determining the firm’s risk principles, risk appetite and major portfolio limits, including their allocation to the business divisions. The risk assessment and management oversight performed by the BoD considers evolving best practices and is intended to conform to statutory requirements, as is the related disclosure in this section.

The BoD Audited is supported by the BoD Risk Committee, which monitors and oversees the firm’s risk profile and the implementation of the risk framework as approved by the BoD. The BoD Risk Committee also assesses and approves the firm’s key risk measurement methodologies. The Group Executive Board (GEB) implements the risk framework, controls the firm’s risk profile and approves all major risk policies. The Group Chief Executive Officer (Group CEO) is responsible for the results of the firm, has risk authority over transactions, positions and exposures, and also allocates portfolio limits approved by the BoD within the business divisions. The divisional Chief Executive Officers are accountable for the results of their business divisions. This includes actively managing their risk exposures, and ensuring that risks and returns are balanced.

The Group Chief Risk Officer reports directly to the Group CEO and has functional and management authority over risk control throughout the firm. Risk Control provides independent oversight of risk and is responsible for implementing the risk control processes for credit, country, market, investment and operational risks. This includes establishing methodologies to measure and assess risk, setting risk limits, and developing and operating an appropriate risk control infrastructure. The risk control process is supported by a framework of policies and authorities, which are delegated to Risk Control Officers according to their expertise, experience and responsibilities.

The Group Chief Financial Officer (Group CFO) is responsible for ensuring that disclosure of our financial performance is clear and transparent and meets regulatory requirements and corporate governance standards. The Group CFO is also responsible for the management of firm-wide treasury risks and for implementing the risk management and control framework for tax.The Group General Counsel is responsible for implementing the firm’s risk management and control principles for legal and compliance matters.
___________________