Showing posts with label Valuation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Valuation. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

THE LIONEL MESSI OF FINANCE

"Stories without numbers are just fairy tales" — Aswath Damodaran

Agustin Mackinlay | @agumack

— Aswath Damodaran. Narrative and Numbers. The Value of Stories in Business. New York: Columbia Business School, 2017

In my finance courses in Barcelona I call Aswath Damodaran “the Lionel Messi of Finance”. In a recent CNBC interview, the New York University professor was introduced as “the Dean of valuation”. And in a recent podcast with blogger Barry Ritholz, he called himself “the Kim Kardashian of valuation”. Whatever the nickname, one thing is certain: prof. Damodaran is a super-star in the world of finance—particularly in valuation. Although Narrative and Numbers was published in 2017, the recent fall in risky assets has rekindled interest on the book. In particular, the valuation of Amazon presented in chapter 9 has led prof. Damodaran to take a short position in that stock—a tremendously successful trade that has been widely discussed in academic circles and in the financial press.

Storytelling: a double-edged sword 
With Narrative and Numbers, prof. Damodaran joins a growing list of authors who emphasize the importance of storytelling skills in business. The list includes, among others, best-selling authors Peter Guber, John Hagel, Joshua Glenn and Rob Walker. “A well-told story connects with listeners in a way that numbers never can”, writes Damodaran. Good stories help people better understand what you are saying; they get remembered; they are likely to generate a favorable response. And they can lead to action.

We often tell in class the story of how Warren Buffet lent $5 billion to Goldman Sachs in the midst of the catastrophic fallout from the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. That particular trade wasn’t his biggest money-maker; yet it allows us to illustrate the link between risk and reward in quite a dramatic way—something that numbers alone cannot achieve. Good stories, writes the author of Narrative and Numbers, reach our hearts and minds in a way that plain facts are unlikely to do. But there is a dark side to storytelling in business. A recent convert to behavioral finance and to the works of Nobel Prize-winner Daniel Kahnemann, Prof. Damodaran points to the danger of “letting emotions run away from the facts”. He cites the cases of fraudster Bernard Madoff and of blood-testing firm Theranos as illustrations of the risks created by stories that are simply too good to be true. Fraudsters, as it turns out, are oftentimes excellent storytellers.

Numbers to the rescue 
Chapter 7 of Narrative and Number is perhaps the most useful of the entire book. Equity analysts are provided with rules that enable them to “test-drive” a narrative. A good story must not only be possible: it must be plausible and even probable. One example will suffice. In a simple two-stage growth valuation model, terminal value (TV) —the value at horizon of all subsequent perpetual cash flows— is the most important number, often accounting for more than 70% of the valuation. The formula:

TV = cash flow at horizon + 1 / (rg)

where r is the discount rate and g is the perpetual growth rate of cash flows after horizon, is described by prof. Damodaran as “an equation taught in finance classes around the world and often reproduced with little thought by analysts”. Careless analysts and lecturers regularly throw perpetual growth rates of 10% in a world of near-zero risk-free rates of return (at least in key European currencies). This is plainly absurd: g should be set at or below the nominal risk-free rate, which acts as a proxy to the long term nominal growth rate of GDP—otherwise a company could become larger than the entire economy. I pay a lot of attention to these issues in my valuation courses, and Narrative and Numbers contains a detailed list of cases where numbers can come to the rescue of a narrative gone wild. 

More on cash flows, less on discount rates
In Narrative and Numbers prof. Damodaran puts decidedly more emphasis on projecting cash flows than on calculating discount rates. Gone are the chapter-long discussions of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and bottom-up betas that are the hallmark of his previous books. This is a welcome development. To project the amount of resources that companies need to invest in order to sustain growth, prof. Damodaran relies on the sales-to-capital ratio. Particularly noteworthy are the valuations of Uber, Ferrari and Amazon. These valuations, based on Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) projections, provide useful class material.

The emphasis on the sales-to-capital ratio is particularly interesting, as financial ratios with sales on the numerator are coming back to the forefront of equity valuation thanks to Financial Times contributor Stuart Kirk. Recently, Mr. Kirk has suggested that new technologies like “machine-learning” are destined to forever change our assumptions about valuation, as depreciation is likely to be replaced by appreciation when the availability of massive amounts of data finally yields more precise algorithms and better performance over time. How would prof. Damodaran’s models cope with these new realities?

Pretty well, I would suggest. A good narrative, far from being self-contained, should be open-ended—and the FCFF valuation model is flexible enough to accommodate the changes suggested by Mr. Kirk. Until these changes materialize, a good old-fashioned valuation will never cease to entertain and instruct. Having shorted the stock of Amazon at nearly $2,000/share and the stock of Apple when the Cupertino giant was worth a trillion dollars in market capitalization, Prof. Damodaran can attest to the power of the traditional, reliable models that I am keen to introduce to our students. 
________________

Sunday, September 17, 2017

THE SALES-TO-CAPITAL RATIO IN VALUATION

AM | @agumack

"A firm can arrive at a high ROC by using its capital to increase sales" — Aswath Damodaran

In his latest book on valuation, Aswath Damodaran pays less attention to the calculation of discount rates, and much more to the projection of cash flows. It's a bit less fun, but more useful. The key tool here is the sales-to-capital ratio; it allows us to compute reinvestment, a key input in FCFF estimations (*):

                             FCFF = EBIT (1 – t) – [Cap Ex – depreciation + ΔWC]

The second term to the right of the equation captures the reinvestment needed for growth: net investment (Cap Ex minus depreciation) plus additional net investments in working capital. The sales-to-capital ratio or capital turnover ratio is:

                             Sales-to-capital = sales / book value of debt and equity

The next step is to compute the change in sales and the change in capital, that is, reinvestment. Now all the pieces come together. If you have an estimation of the sales-to-capital ratio and a revenue (sales) projection, you can arrive at reinvestment by dividing the change in sales by the sales-to-capital ratio. For example, in the World Domination scenario for Amazon (p. 145) sales are projected at $246.9bn in year 6 and at $278.8bn in year 7, while the sales-to-capital ratio is kept constant at 3.68 times. Therefore reinvestment in year 7 is:

                            ($278.8bn – $246.9bn) / 3.68 = $8.6bn

Now all that remains to do to arrive at FCFF is to subtract that number from the projection of the after-tax EBIT, which Prof. Damodaran puts at $17.3bn. Therefore, in year 7, Free Cash Flow to the Firm is $17.3bn – $8.6bn = $8.7bn.

(*) Aswath Damodaran. Narrative and Numbers. The Value of Stories in Business. New York: Columbia Business School, 2017. See also: "Valuing Young, Start-up and Growth Companies: Estimation Issues and Valuation Challenges", Stern School of Business, New York University, 2009, especially pp. 26-27
__________________

Sunday, July 2, 2017

QUICK VALUATION NEWS, No. 3

AM | @agumack

"... a CVD, Chief Value Destroyer" — Dan Loeb

[1] Nestlé. What a great story (*). This is exactly what we discussed in the Summer I course on Security Analysis BSF313how companies can enhance their own value to make themselves less attractive to potential predators. (We used Prof. Damodaran's book and his excellent VIDEO on the topic). Just days after activist hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb took a 1.25% stake in the $263bn venerable Swiss company, management announced the equivalent of $21bn in stock buybacks. According to this Bloomberg article, any CEO who'd oppose Mr. Loeb would be branded a 'CVD'—Chief Value Destroyer. Note that Nestlé [NESN: VX] now "aims to gear up its balance sheet, setting a target of 2 times net debt to ebitda, up from 1.3 times at the end of last year". A debt-financed stock buyback is just what the doctor would order for a mature, underlevered company that seeks to enhance its value in the equity market.

(*) Ralph Atkins & Scheherazade Daneshkhu: "Nestlé unveils $21bn buyback days after activist Loeb urges shake-up", Financial Times, 28 June 2017.
______________

[2] Uber. Prof. Damodaran is valuing Uber—again (*). In his book Narrative and Numbers. The Value of Stories in Business, he came up with at $23.4bn valuation in his most optimistic DCF valuation. Now he applies a different method —a bottom-up approach called 'user-based valuation'— and he estimates Uber's value of equity at $37.2bn. "Talk about a moving target!", he says. I am also noting that in his recent valuations, Prof. Damodaran is putting more effort in the estimation of cash flows, and less in the calculation of discount rates. It's a bit less fun, but more useful

  
(*) "User/Subscriber Economics: An Alternative View of Uber's Value", Musings on Markets blog, 28 June 2017.
______________

Monday, June 5, 2017

QUICK VALUATION NEWS No. 2

AM | @agumack

"On ne demande pas son âge à une jolie femme" — Frédéric Mazella

[1] Start-up valuation. The French weekly business magazine Challenges reports on the « radar des valos », a survey of more than a hundred French start-up tech companies with a valuation above the €20 million mark (*). BlaBlaCar is still the only Unicorn—defined as a private company valued at more than €1bn. There is little on the valuation methodology; we are told, however, that Challenges worked in tandem with boutique investment bank Cambon partners. The companies are presented in five categories: software/adtech, biotech, objects connectés, fintech, and services et e-commerce.

(*) Laure-Emmanuelle Husson: "La valorisation des start-up reste un tabou", Challenges, 31 May 2017.
_____________

[2] William Sharpe. Barry Ritholz defines William Sharpe as "the man who figured out how to price portfolios via the capital-asset-pricing model, and how to measure risk via the 'reward to variability ratio', or what has come to be known as the Sharpe ratio". We use the CAPM in all of of our DCF valuation cases in class. Now Mr. Sharpe is turning his attention to ... retirement planning (*).

(*) Barry Ritholz: "Tackling the Nastiest, Hardest Problem in Finance", Bloomberg, June 5, 2017.
______________

[3] Infinite cash-flows. Last week in Security Analysis BSF313 I stayed a few minutes after class with a student to show that our calculations were OK (it was an old case from Prof. Damodaran on Procter & Gamble with the two-stage growth Dividend Discount Model). In the end, we agreed on the valuation. By throwing cash-flows for a ridiculously long number of years something that Excel allows you to do in a matter of seconds— you can check your calculations. This is very useful when discount rates change, and when there are doubts about the discount rate that applies to the Terminal Value (TV) and to the PV of the TV. Remember to use discount factors when discount rates change!
_____________

[4] Amazon'stock price. And Amazon [NYSE: AMZN] hits $1,000. Chapeau! Warren Buffett recently acknowleged what a miss it had been. But he added that it was too late to buy the stock now. Analysts, though, remain quite bullish:

Analysts on Wall Street are overwhelmingly bullish — only one brokerage has a hold and none have "sells", according to Bloomberg terminal data, and some of the most optimistic see shares hitting $1,250 in the next 12 months. Few want to miss out on one of the Internet's biggest stock runs. Amazon shares are up 38% from a year ago and 14 times more valuable than they were a decade ago (*).

I am currently reading Prof. Damodaran's latest book Narrative and Numbers. The Value of Stories in Business, which contains his most recent valuation of Amazon. I plan to review it here. Spoiler: even his most favorable scenario yields a value per share that is well below current prices.

(*) Elisabeth Weise: "Amazon stock hits $1,000. What will keep it from $2,000?", USA Today, 30 May 2017.
______________

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

QUICK VALUATION NEWS

AM | @agumack

[1] Value of private companies hits $490bn. With Uber valued at $68bn and Airbnb at $30bn, the value of late-stage private companies in the US and Europe has soared above $490bn, according to an index created by Scenic Advisement, a San Francisco boutique investment bank (*).

(*) Leslie Hook: "Value of private companies hits high of $490bn as tech start-ups shun markets", Financial Times, 29 May 2017. 
__________

[2] Zalando's business model. Zalando, Europe' biggest online fashion retailer, "is looking to transform itself from an online store into a digital platform where brands can transact directly with customers. Zalando then charges a commission on each purchase" (*). Two comments: (1) clearly, the company is changing its narrative, as Amazon Fashion lurks in the background; (2) I suspect that PE ratios for a 'digital platform' company are considerably higher than for online stores.

(*) Guy Chazan: "Zalando fashions a response to Amazon threat", Financial Times, 29 May 2017.
__________

[3] EM currencies and the carry trade. Some see danger ahead for those involved in the carry trade (buying high-yielding EM currencies with cheap EUR and USD funding). Harvard economist Jeffrey Frankel once likened carry trading to "picking up pennies in front of a steam roller" (*).

(*) Natasha Doff: "History says Emerging Markets carry trade can only end in tears", Bloomberg, 30 May 2017.
__________

[4] Equity Risk Premium. This is quite a story. In a letter published by the Financial Times, a Chicago-based portfolio manager argues that the decline in the Equity Risk Premium is mostly driven by a confusion: "The widespread adoption of passive investment in equities due to lower costs has increased the valuation of stocks because the investing public has confused low cost with low risk, thus decreasing the equity risk premium demanded by investors and driving up share prices".

(*) Daniel Mauro: "After correction comes the pain for low-cost investors", Financial Times, 2 May 2017. See also Prof. Damodaran' ERP calculations.
___________

Friday, February 17, 2017

DAMODARAN WATCH: THE KIM KARDASHIAN OF VALUATION

AM | @agumack

Students know that I am a fan of Professor Aswath Domadaran. In class, I call him "The Lionel Messi of Finance". But it turns out that he calls himself "The Kim Kardashian of Valuation"! That's because, as he tells Barry Ritholz in the podcast below, he "shows everything". This is of course a reference to the tonnes of material that he publishes online. You can see some of the relevant links to the right. Anyway, here are some recent ideas from the man himself. Enjoy!

[1] Apple valuation. Prof. Damodaran calls Apple [Nasdaq: AAPL] the "Greatest Cash Machine in History" [see his detailed post]. (I remember that we used to say the same thing about Google a few years ago). In his Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) valuation, he arrives at a value per share of $129.02. As the market closed yesterday at $135.35, the shares are "fullly valued", although he will wait for a price of $140 before selling his position. Well done! In class at EU Business School, I use Apple as an example of how a company can successfully 'declare war on its WACC'. The Cupertino giant does that by outsourcing its production (lower beta), by turning the iPhone into a non-discretionary good (lower beta), by gently increasing its debt ratio, and by aggressively using interest rate and foreign currency swaps (lower cost of debt). 

[2] Podcast. Listen to this Barry Ritholz podcast with Professor Damodaran; he calls himself "The Kim Kardashian of Valuation". And he discusses lots of topics about finance, valuation, active vs. passive asset management, etc.

[3] Equity Risk Premium. On his Twitter account, Prof. Damodaran publishes his monthly estimation of the Equity Risk Premium. Instead of relying on historical data, he estimates the expected return on the S&P500 index by projecting cash flows in a two-stage growth version with a Terminal Value. We might take a look at that method this summer in Corporate Finance at EU Business School. The latest estimate: 5.59%.





 ______________

Thursday, January 12, 2017

A NEW BOOK BY PROFESSOR DAMODARAN

AM | @agumack

Exciting news! Professor Aswath Damodaran is out with a new book! Narrative and Numbers. The Value of Stories in Business has just been published by the Columbia Business School. As he explains in this post from his blog and on this presentation, he develops the valuation of four companies: Uber, Amazon, Alibaba and Ferrari. He is as interested about the story as it is conveyed by companies themselves as he is about the raw numbers. Here's Prof. Damodaran on his choices:

1. Uber, the ride-sharing phenomenon: I start with the story that I told about Uber in June 2014, and the resulting value, and how that story evolved over the next 15 months as I learned more about the company and its market/competition changed.

2. Amazon, the Field of Dreams Company: Amazon is a story stock that seems to defy the numbers laws and I use it to illustrate how the value for Amazon can vary as a function of the story you tell about it.

3. Alibaba, the China story: The China big market story has been used to justify the valuations of many companies, but Alibaba is one case where the use of that story is actually merited. In my story, Alibaba continues to dominate the growing Chinese online retail market and my value reflects that, but I also look at how that value will change if Alibaba can replicate its success globally (Alibaba, the Global Story).


4. Ferrari, the Exclusive Club: I value Ferrari as an exclusive club, leading into its IPO, and explore how that value will change if you assume that it will follow a different business model.



Reading Prof. Damodaran's book could be a very interesting undertaking for the Finance Club. Because Uber is still not a public company, I am pretty sure that the analysis will include 'bottom-up' beta calculations for the cost of equity. The Amazon story looks particularly interesting from a narrative point of view, as CEO Jeff Bezos has been incredibly spot-on. Alibaba would take us to the Chinese market (and the cost of capital calculations in the Chinese currency) while Ferrari is in a league of its own.
________________

Saturday, June 18, 2016

PROF. DAMODARAN ON 'BOTTOM-UP BETAS'

AM | @Mackfinance

"I'm actually wedded to bottom-up betas" — Aswath Damodaran

I have recently decided to devote more attention in class to what Prof. Damodaran calls 'bottom-up' betas. Students seem to find it interesting too. Here's some video material with the explanations:







1. Identify the business or businesses that make up the firm whose beta we are trying to estimate.

2. Calculate the levered betas of other publicly traded firms that are primarily or only in each of those businesses. Use regression analysis. In most businesses, there are at least a few comparable firms and in some businesses, there can be hundreds. Begin with a narrow definition of comparable firms, and widen it if the number of comparable firms is too small. Consider the possibilities of widening your search globally to get more firms in your sample. Do hundreds of regression! [TABLE]

3. Calculate the average of levered betas for each relevant sector.

4. Use the average debt-to-equity ratio (D/E) for each sector [this information will be provided] to ‘unlever’ the average beta with the formula: βU = βL / [ 1 + (1 – t) (D/E)]. This is the average unlevered beta for each division.

5. Calculate the bottom-up unlevered beta of the firm as a weighted-average of the unlevered betas for each division. But what weights do we use? There are two possibilities: use the proportion of the enterprise value of the businesses relative to the total enterprise value of the firm (enterprise value = market value of debt + market value of equity – cash). Or you could just use the revenues (sales) by sector.

6. Use the debt-to-equity ratio of the company to arrive at the levered beta, using the formula: βL = βU [ 1 + (1 – t) (D/E)]. That’s it!
_______________

Thursday, February 4, 2016

FOUR STORIES ON VALUATION

AM | @Mackfinance

[1] Stocks are risky! The key take-away from the market turmoil so far in 2016 is a reminder that stocks are risky (*). Indeed! Here's Prof. Damodaran:

The global equity markets collectively lost $5.54 trillion in value during the month, roughly 8.42% of overall value. The global breakdown of value also reflects some regional variations, with Chinese equities declining from approximately 17% of global market capitalization to closer to 15%. The good news is that there have been dozens of months that delivered worse returns in the aggregate. In fact, the US equity market's performance in January 2016 would not even make the list of 25 worst months in US market history. What I learned from January 2016 is that stocks are risky (I need reminders every now and then), that market pundits are about as reliable as soothsayers, that the doomsayers will remind you that they "told you so" and that life goes on. I am just glad the month is over!

(*) Aswath Damodaran: "January 2016 data update", Musings on markets, 1 February 2016
____________

 

[2] Platform companies. Morgan Stanley analyst Kate Huberty recenly argued that Apple would command a forward P/E multiple of 18x if valued as a "large-cap platform company across industries"; however, the forward P/E multiple would tumble to 13x if the company were to be valued as a large-cap IT harware vendor. But what is a platform company? The FT has been publishing some interesting articles on this topic: "In its simplest form, a platform company is one that expands by constant acquisitions, usually powered by huge debt ... basically a company dependent on acquisitions for growth, taking advantage of cheap borrowing costs to buy up businesses to expand quickly. The recent travails of hedge fund manager Bill Ackman (of Valeant fame) has led him to admit: "We believe 'platform value' is real, but, as we have been painfully reminded, it is a much more ephemeral form of value than ... other assets" (*).

(*) Arash Massoudi, Miles Johnson & Dan McCrum: "Platform party topples over into hangover" Financial Times, 2 February 2016.
____________

[3] Platform companies & short-sellers. Short-sellers, understandably, do no like platform companies. Here's Jim Chanos: "They're investment banking-driven. Those roll-ups are just huge fee payers to Wall Street". This is from the FT (*):

Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Altice, Platform Specialty Products and Nomad Foods have all grown rapidly by making a string of big acquisitions facilitated by record-low interest rates. That activity has placed these platform companies among the leading participants in the overall mergers and acquisitions boom. Since August, shares in each of the four have fallen by more than 50 per cent, as investors began to take fright at their heavy debt burdens and ability to grow without further deals. Valeant, Altice, Platform Specialty and Nomad have a collective debt burden of $78bn at a time when the cost of corporate debt has been rising. The $1.1bn in fees paid by the four companies since 2013 is a significant revenue source. The figure is roughly equal to the amount of fees paid by Swiss based corporations in 2015 and close to the total fees made from South and Central America over the same period. Valeant has paid $398m in total investment banking fees since 2013, a figure which includes payments to banks that helped fund, advise and underwrite its debt-backed expansion. The largest recipients of fees from Valeant were Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank, which received $60m and $48.5m respectively, according to estimates from Thomson Reuters and Freeman Consulting.

(*) Arash Massoudi, Miles Johnson & Dan McCrum: "Wall Street the winner as four 'roll-ups' spend $1bn on investment bank fees", Financial Times, 2 February 2016.
_______________

[4] Accounting reforms. A new IASB financial reporting standard is likely to have implications about the way revenue and leases are accounted for:

All will have an impact on investors, as they have the potential to affect lending arrangements, dividend policies, tax planning and share prices. They also represent a step up in regulatory co-operation between the US and international standard setters. Converging the different corporate reporting frameworks has been fraught. While the two regulators were largely able to agree on the revenue recognition and lease accounting standards, attempts to agree a common base for assessing financial instruments failed in 2014 ... However, it is the new standard for accounting for leases — known as IFRS 16 — that is arguably the most important, because it ends a practice that investors claim has hidden assets and liabilities from plain sight (*).

(*) Kate Burguess & Harriet Agnew : "Accounting’s big shake-up to bring more transparency", Financial Times, 21 January 2016

_______________